The Forum > General Discussion > SSM Flavours Icecream
SSM Flavours Icecream
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 29
- 30
- 31
- Page 32
-
- All
Posted by phanto, Tuesday, 13 June 2017 4:29:35 PM
| |
No, phanto, I don’t.
<<You want to deny basic human rights to couples simply because they refuse to get married.>> I suggest you look up what human rights are: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_Australia And whatever happened to that apparent agreement we reached regarding the need for a speedy and reliable way to determine relationship status in certain circumstances? The one that had you devise a system, to unnecessarily replace marriage, just to deal with it? Have you changed your position on that one already? That’s gotta be a record for you! <<This is discrimination pure and simple.>> No, it’s not, and we already established why: http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=19002#338753 <<Government involvement in marriage and the distribution of rights according to marital status is discrimination of the first order.>> Why? <<Anyone who agrees with government involvement and distribution of rights according to marital status is basically in favour of discrimination.>> How so? <<Anyone who avails themselves of government involvement in marriage continues to make an inhuman system even worse whatever their sexuality might be.>> Why? <<You are one of those people who want to perpetrate an unjust system.>> How so? <<Nothing else needs to be said here.>> Yes, I can certainly see why you’d be in a hurry to shut this down quickly now that you think you’re finally on to something after nearly two years of failed arguments, but you still need to explain why same-sex couples should be discriminated against, and I’m not leaving until you do. (You realised you were heading for a dead end with that double-up of an arrangement before, didn't you?) You now also need to explain why marital status is discriminatory, despite the circumstances we’ve discussed: "Circumstances which require two people to have considered their relationship seriously, and contemplated the level of trust they are willing to place in each other. Circumstances which require more commitment and trust than, say, the relationship of a pair of horny kids who have shacked-up together ‘cause mum and dad suck, and they wanna smoke weed. http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=19002#338753 Or are you just going to dig your heels in now and assert that marriage is discriminatory? Posted by AJ Philips, Tuesday, 13 June 2017 6:06:20 PM
|
You want to deny basic human rights to couples simply because they refuse to get married. This is discrimination pure and simple.
The whole system is discriminatory and not because of sexuality but because of married status. Government involvement in marriage and the distribution of rights according to marital status is discrimination of the first order.
Anyone who agrees with government involvement and distribution of rights according to marital status is basically in favour of discrimination. Anyone who avails themselves of government involvement in marriage continues to make an inhuman system even worse whatever their sexuality might be. Anyone with any integrity would not be a party to this system.
You are one of those people who want to perpetrate an unjust system.
Nothing else needs to be said here.