The Forum > General Discussion > Anti-Abortion site deemed
Anti-Abortion site deemed
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Page 8
- 9
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
'Were these pics put up with the consent of the ladies?'
I have no idea. Since when did the media get a conscience anyway? They are the first to film murdered bodies with or without consent. Why would a mother care, if she is callous enough to allow the butchers to do this to her child. She has probably been told and chosen to believe that its not a human being anyway despite clear evidence of hands, legs, eyes, face etc. But don't let facts get in the way of emotion, just ask Col.
meredith you ask
'Could you come to terms with abortion being legal but not available as a casual form of birth control, rather it is something a woman does with a heavy heart and at times necessary?'
I have come to terms with the fact that killing children is legal. It still does not make it right. In some cultures it is legal to belt your wife. This does not make it right. I appreciate that some woman do choose abortions with a heavy heart. If I was about to take a life my heart would also weigh very heavy. I am also sure many woman later regret their decision. Maybe if they saw the images on the website brought to our attention in this blog they would change their heart or at least think a bit more clearly.
stg writes
'Some children probably would have been better off aborted rather than born into the horrific circumstances they were.'
I would imagine at the time one of Obamas parents decided they did not want him that many would of argued your point. Thankfully he was at least given an opportunity unlike million of others. You yourself might not even have an opinion if your parents thought that way