The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Copenhagen: the price of the atmosphere > Comments

Copenhagen: the price of the atmosphere : Comments

By Andrew Glikson, published 31/12/2009

A denial campaign waged by contrarians supported by fossil fuel interests is holding the world to ransom.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 13
  7. 14
  8. 15
  9. Page 16
  10. All
Horus

The 'airborne fraction' (AF) has shown little variation over this period …”

You obviously have trouble understanding that statement
Posted by Q&A, Thursday, 7 January 2010 10:50:46 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Q & A

OK, how about you explain it all to me.

Please use simple language , so lesser mortals like me can "understand".
Posted by Horus, Friday, 8 January 2010 4:44:09 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Pontificator “Most science today honours the law of Modern day…..

- The more complex a topic is the less likely an absolute answer will be derived.”


Ah yes, some things are so complex no rules can be applied

They are reduced to what amounts to “subjective judgement”

In educated circles such studies are called “the Arts”, so no one will confuse them with “Science”

Thus climatology owes as much to "science" as does to preferences of Picasso versus Chagall or Boticelli

And all that confirms my view

AGW / GW is not “science”

It is nothing more than a bunch of subjective opinions, held by some folk who also happen to have qualifications in the so called "scientific" disciplines.

As such, the notion of “climatology” and theories associated under its “political” banner have no more validity than

my assertion that the whole scam is the product of politically motivated “collectivists” attempting to impose

Socialism by Stealth.

And finally “Occam's razor is a relative position.”

Oh yes but "Occams Razor" is relative to…

what actually happened.

Strangely or not, I find more comfort in basing global theories on processes which can emulate history versus

processes which substitute history with the pure fantasy of some egomaniac scientists hallucinations

and to all those of the elitist lobby of AGW zealots remember, “skeptics” are people with an equal right to hold and express an opinion too,

it is what’s called “democracy
Posted by Col Rouge, Friday, 8 January 2010 7:44:27 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hilarious, Col, brilliant!

I don't know though, socialism by revolution is more tempting--I mean, cutting off capitalist's heads and all that ... :-)
Posted by Squeers, Friday, 8 January 2010 8:06:13 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Shorter Col: "I don't understand science, therefore AGW is Socialism by Stealth".

Squeers, I don't think he was trying to be funny - it's his mantra.
Posted by CJ Morgan, Friday, 8 January 2010 9:47:35 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 13
  7. 14
  8. 15
  9. Page 16
  10. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy