The Forum > Article Comments > The impossibility of atheism II > Comments
The impossibility of atheism II : Comments
By Peter Sellick, published 27/2/2009Are we to damn Christianity because cruel things were perpetrated in its name of which Christ would have been ashamed?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Page 16
-
- All
Christianity is incorporated into the Australian Constitution and also that of the US is by the making of either the President or the Queen representative of Almighty God and then having all Judges and Magistrates swear allegiance. The English in the Coronation Oath 1688 ( Imp) incorporated the four Gospels, but not the Epistles into their existing Constitution, after James II a closet Roman Catholic did a runner. The army told him they would not fight for a Roman Catholic King.
He word Queen or Her Majesty appears forty times in the Australian Constitution, and the Oath of Allegiance as Schedule taken by all Federal Judges and Magistrates, means that if they refuse a jury trial when requested, they are breaking their word. Jury trial was the way that Christianity separated administrative power from judicial power, and s 79 Constitution judges plural makes juries mandatory.
Menzies was a power freak, and when he could not count on the High Court doing his bidding after the Communist Party case, he closed its doors by giving a Registrar power to refuse to let a normal person file in its original jurisdiction. That was 1952. Commonwealth is a word from the KJV Bible, where it is found in Ephesians 2:12.
In the BS Bibles used in the US, the translation is citizen, and these are misleading and deceptive. As for Sharia Law, there is no mercy in it at all, and might is right. The Allah of the Qu’ran is not obliged to keep his promises as the Christian God does, and as a consequence a man is not bound by his word, only by writing. It is totally antithetic to the Christian law where Almighty God has promised law and justice in mercy, in all the judgments given by the Queen