The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Jewish West Bank settlements a bad mistake > Comments

Jewish West Bank settlements a bad mistake : Comments

By Philip Mendes, published 12/3/2008

Ideally, most if not all of the West Bank settlements should be dismantled.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All
I think mit might be too late for Israel and weight of numbers both within Israel and on it's borders will see it's demise. No amount of weasel words or false hopes and expectations can prevent that particular overwhelming.

The lose of support of the rest of the world for Israel as it grapples, in it's usual violenct and militaristic manner, is now accelerating.

As the current US recession deepens the Israeli financial life-support will choke.

Naaaaah I feel such discussion as this article attempts is now all too little and far too late.

Just look at how ineffective Israel was recently in Lebanon and especially in Gaza. Look at how much condemnation the barbarism received. Israel can't even eliminate a bunch of backyard terrorists. Sure it can kill but those killed will simply be replaced by from a growing and more repressed people.

And once the situation get's all to hard for the Western Liberal Democracies they will wash their hands in the manner of Herod and withdraw support and as sure as Cain killed Abel we won't send troops in support.

Another Holocaust? Well it would be the second in the region and the third in the world in the last 100 years.
Posted by keith, Thursday, 13 March 2008 11:51:01 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
This is a good example why a two-state solution is no longer viable.

Whilst the establishment of the settlements, with no possible doubt, was conducted for political reasons and just compensation is due to those disposessed, there is now close to a quarter of a million people living in the West Bank and - as correctly argued - people should have the right to acquire title and live where they like.

Once again, the "problem" isn't the Jewish state or the lack of a Palestinian state, but rather the unequal application of universal rights.
Posted by Lev, Thursday, 13 March 2008 2:06:49 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Phillip

I think it is the two states position which creates the problems you are talking about.

To address the horrific Nazi genocide of Jews with the genocide of Palestinians is not and never will solve the situation for Jews or, obviously, Palestinians.
Posted by Passy, Thursday, 13 March 2008 9:24:11 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
GENEVA CONVENTION...

Legal: The settlements are arguably illegal since they contravene Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention which precludes an occupying power from settling its own citizens in territory taken by military force.

Well.. I guess some people say "Our survival was not at stake when the
Geneva convention was framed, so.. it's irrelevant to us"

LEGAL STATUS?.. let the above speak for itself. No country will allow foreigners to make laws which are going to send it down the gurgler of history.

The only people who abide by it, (The Convention) are those who are secure enough to see that they can abide by it and still survive.

When it comes to the Israel/Palestinian situation.... well.. only time will tell.

67 BORDERS ... what the ? "why" ? who should decide this? I kinda think that those whos blood and guts was spilt defending their country should. If 67 borders.. why stop there ? Lets face it, there are many , HAMAS in particular who want only ONE border.. the one within which there is no Israel.

Well..I'm not going to repeat all that I've said b4.. let history be the judge :)
cheers all.
Posted by BOAZ_David, Friday, 14 March 2008 8:31:27 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Passy

You still repeat the myth that Israel was created to provide a solution to the holocaust displacement.

It wasn't. Apart from the Jewish communities who were there from Roman times there were a considerable number who moved there from within the Caliphate. And then the Jews who arrived from Eastern Europe. Over 100 years ago Jerusalem had a majority Jewish population.

The post years saw an influx of European refugees, it also saw an influx of up to a million Jewish refugees from other Arab countries, after centuries of discrimination. Half of that section of Israel which is Jewish comes from Middle Eastern stock. A conveniently forgotten, or denied group.

Jews of course weren't the only non-Muslim group edged out of the Middle East. Christians, Baha'i Druze, many found refuge in Israel.

This is not an anti Muslim rant, but extremism has caused awful hardships for so many including Muslims as a result of a fundamentalism which does not hesitate to kill those it considers infidel. You'd think that the bleeding heart left would show some sympathy for all these people who suffer because of the Islamists but they seem to be to busy criticising Israel who at least has given these minorities a home and the right to vote to everyone.
Posted by logic, Monday, 17 March 2008 3:23:45 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Logic

Thanks. I don't think anything you say undermines my point. The creation of Israel was an act of genocide against the Palestinians.

And to my mind that creation was a consequence of the Holocaust. It was Edward Said who I think described the Palestinians as the victims of victims.

Certainly there were Jewish people in the area, and I agree some had been there for millenia. And I agree the pogroms in Eastern Europe drove many Jewish people from their homelands and some to Palestine. Many went to the US or to a lesser extent the UK.

Kevin Bray in an article in The Canberra Times on 13 March says this:

"Pre-1948, Arabs owned 94 per cent of the then Palestine and Jews 6 per cent. Today, Gaza and the West Bank comprise 22 per cent of that land, all of which is under Israeli occupation (with more than 550 Israeli checkpoints or road blocks) and almost half of which comprises illegal Israeli settlements (contrary to the Fourth Geneva Convention) with more than 450,000 settlers, Israeli-only roads and restricted military/security zones."

So in my view Palestine was not a land without a people for a people without a land. It was overwhelmingly populated by the Palestinians. The UN deciding that there should be a two state solution does not denigrate from the fact that Israel was founded on the bones of the Palestinians.

A democratic and secular Palestine is in my view the answer, although I accept it is not foreseeable in the present context unless there are developments in neighbouring countries which see the overthrow of the Arab dictatorships.

I think to describe Israel as a democracy is to misunderstand its nature.

It is a state created to allow democracy for a minority while denying it for the majority - the Palestinians. It is a democracy like white South Africa was a democracy.
Posted by Passy, Monday, 17 March 2008 8:34:55 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Logic,

It is a matter of fact that Israel was created as a result of the holocaust. It is even mentioned in the Israeli Declaration of Independence.

The prior existence of Jewish communities in Palestine does not change this. It is the creation of Israel not the prevalence of Jews in the region that is raised.
Posted by Lev, Monday, 17 March 2008 9:54:44 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Passy

"The creation of Israel was an act of genocide against the Palestinians."

How can it be an act of genocide when the Palestinian population is increasing? Genocide means wiping out of a group. That is not happening. Israel is not trying to kill all the Palestinians. Israel allows Muslims in the parliament even makes one of them a Cabinet Minister. That view is nonsense.

The Canberra Times is a very anti-Israeli newspaper. Kevin Bray is wrong. Read the Australian for a more balanced and accurate viewpoint. When you compare populations what is defined as the borders of Palestine? Israel only includes a portion of what was sometimes called Palestine. Those sorts of figures are meaningless on their own. Some parts of Palestine had majority Jewish populations, including Jerusalem. Then add up to a million Jews pushed out of Muslim lands, plus the Christians and others pushed out as a result of Islamic ethnic cleansing, and you have an entirely different proposition. Many of these others religious groups found refuge in Israel which gives citizen rights to people of all faiths.

The rest of Palestine was occupied after an they waged war on Israel with the stated object of exterminating it. Of course the Israelis occupied it just as the allies occupied Germany and Japan. Except that those countries realised their bad mistake and made friends. Fanatics wanting the whole world to follow Mohamed just continued with their quest, destroyed their economy, encouraged children to commit suicide murders and fired rockets at Israel and generally made life a misery for everyone including their own people. Arafat, an Egyptian, became leader and put the people's money in his own bank account. Children's TV programs showed the glories of suicide in the name of Islam, while a pathetic excuse for an education system produced maps without Israel. This was all done by Arafat and then Hamas.

I an sorry for the Palestinians, but the blame for their plight is with the Arab world, and no one else.
Posted by logic, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 9:14:47 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Lev

Have you heard of the Balfour declaration? Hopefully you realise that it long preceded WW2.

And what about the Jews and others pushed out of Arab lands as a result of Muslim ethnic cleansing? Egypt, Lebanon, Morocco, Libya, Saudi Arabia, Yemen etc etc. Ancient pre-Islamic communities of Christians, Jews etc. As I said, and you don't wish to hear, almost a million Jews, who now make up about one half of the Jewish section of Israel's population. Not to mention the Baha'i, Druze, Samaritans and some of the Christians who found refuge in Israel.

And why shouldn't there be a prevalence of Jews in the region? What is wrong with that? They are civilised, they don't force other religious groups to build their Mosques or Temples smaller than the Synagogues, they don't proselytize and their religious beliefs grants that all good people can go to heaven regardless of their beliefs. They give everyone an equal vote in a democratic Parliament. Australia has a prevalence of Christians, Lebanon has managed to convert a Christian majority into a Muslim one. Do you also object to that?
Posted by logic, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 9:35:28 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Yes, I have a copy of the Balfour Declaration in an Arab-Israel documentary reader. It states the British government supports the establishment of a homeland for Jews in Palestine, which I support. It seems hard for some people but they don't seem to be understand the distinction between a Jewish homeland in Palestine and a Jewish state of Israel.

I am not sure what relevance my opposition to anti-Judiasm in Arab Muslim countries is supposed to do with this, or why the religious makeup of Israel is supposed to be relevant here.

I am simply addressing the claim that the State of Israel was created as a consequence of the holocaust. As I said, this is a matter of fact and the Israeli Declaration of Independence even states this it.

I am a little surprised by your opposition to this. It strikes me as rather like opposing evolution or denying gravity.
Posted by Lev, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 12:14:25 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy