The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Broadband ... the only game in town > Comments

Broadband ... the only game in town : Comments

By Selwyn Johnston, published 24/5/2007

Mr Rudd’s donation of $4.5 billion to any telco consortium is at worst a long shot non-achieving punt, or at best a hollow election stunt: here's why ...

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. All
i wonder if one glassfibre connection is enough. if it is, there's a physical 'monopoly' which calls for commercial monopoly, or the madness described above.

the government is getting out of the roadbuilding business, so this is the wrong time to suggest that the government should build the 'superhighway' infrastructure and rent it out- but that seems to be the logical response to reality.

an independent candidate can say "let's go back to some government ownership", and i wish they would.
Posted by DEMOS, Friday, 25 May 2007 1:12:29 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Who is this guy? I live in his electorate and have never heard of him. Netherless the arguments (complaints) he provides are simplistic. The points bought forward by him were heard 18 months ago and we have moved on from there. What is the price that Telstra wants for their unbundled loop.? What is the G9 SAU going to reveal. What is Telstra's SAU (special access undertaking) going to consist of?
How much, who will benefit, who will the Government subsidise and what next for the winning and losing consortiums?
None of this was addressed by this nobody, why was this article posted.?
Go to www. whirlpool.net.au if you want more info on this and other broadband issues.
Posted by seaweed, Friday, 25 May 2007 10:17:01 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Why the Government should not allow any one telco to control a FTTH/FTTN is quite simply.

Those people who lived in a non-profitable area would simply be left in the dark ages.

There are two choices.
1. The Telcos work together for the betterment of the nation.
or
2. An independent company in partnership with the Government would own and operate FTTH/FTTN. The company would not be permitted to provide telephony or internet services to Business and Residential Customers. The Government would simply be an investor and would protect our rights through the ACCC.

The $64 question. Who would provide a landline service at a reasonable cost to those who are less fortunate. Now I telling you with Moblie Phones and Internet Phone Services, that landline telephony has reached it used by date.
Posted by southerner, Saturday, 26 May 2007 9:55:11 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Southerner, you wrote: "Now I telling you with Moblie Phones and Internet Phone Services, that landline telephony has reached it used by date."

I am not quite sure what you mean - aren't Internet Phone services made over landline telephony? I use them a lot, but they ultimately pass through the copper wires from my home to the exchange. I would never use mobile phones because these are unethical - sending harmful electromagnetic radiation through innocent people.
Posted by Yuyutsu, Sunday, 27 May 2007 12:13:12 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Yuyutsu,

If you have an internet service which you receive by wireless, cable or satellite why would you as a person need to pay for landline telephony. While I may stand corrected, this would also apply to FTTN/FTTH as I understand it. Add mobile phones to the mix, than landlline telephony is certainly dying. Have a close look at landline telephony cost. The telcos will offer you a landline telephony line rental for as little as $19.00 a month, even capped plans which include the line rental.

If you have ADSL coming over a landline for example. Here are some basic cost to you. Landline Telephony $19.00/mth Broadband 9GB $49.00/mth Internet Phone Service $9.95/mth. In my household that would mean a seving of $125.00 per month. Without the Landline Telephony cost that means a savings of $144.00, these savings means you could afford to have paid television.

Right now for example with a mobile phone you can have a phone service, the internet and paid TV. Why would you need Landline Telephony. As far as mobile phones are concerned I find that they intrude on my life.

For these reason I believe in time Landline Telephony will not be required.
Posted by southerner, Sunday, 27 May 2007 6:01:11 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
When you use a mobile phone, it goes to the nearest tower, then where?

Are you saying that mobile calls do not use the copper network?

Do you realise that the mess we have is because our Govt. could not see the difference between Telstra the retailer and wholesaler of telecommunications and Telstra the owner of telecommunications infrastructure.

The two should have been split, and Costello is to blame.
Posted by ruawake, Sunday, 27 May 2007 6:21:56 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy