The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Global warming the real terror > Comments

Global warming the real terror : Comments

By Judy Cannon, published 24/2/2006

There is a danger much greater than terrorism - global warming.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 22
  7. 23
  8. 24
  9. Page 25
  10. All
Methane gas liberation of domestic animals enhance global warming.Such animals destroy forests if there were no fodders for them.They are responsible this way for increasing CO2 gas also.But man can tackle the problem by green fodders cultivation in planned manner.In this way green house gas is reduced and man gains economically by their productivity.
Posted by DR.PRABIR, Wednesday, 12 April 2006 2:48:37 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Greenhouse gases (GGs) are not exactly irrelevant. At about 10% of the climate change problem we should not be concerned about them if we are serious about dealing with rampant Climate Change phenomena.

Points to note in clearing up GG myths:

*GGs are removed from the atmosphere by many mechanisms. 40%, according to NOAA figures end up precipitated into oceans.

*The small global (<1deC) warming that perceived-increases in GG emissions are causing gets emitted to space over polar regions where complex ice crystallisation processes act as black body radiators with frequencies well below GG absorption spectra.

*Climate change is not caused by GG warming. It is initiated by siltation blown across and wastewater pollutants run off into oceans(cyclonic-activity). This allows huge, rapid increases in Sea surface temperatures that will not and cannot correlate well with much slower changes predicted by GG theory. The additional oceanic surface heat must find its way rapidly to polar regions by coriolis forces and the 2LT(second-law-of-thermodynamics). Resultant thermodynamic imbalances redistribute chaotically across the planet.

*Removal of vegetative ground covers and bore-water-lowering of water-tables creates additional heat loads and thermodynamic imbalances(drought) in temperate/desert areas. This heat adds additional thermodynamic imbalances to global-energy-circuitry.

*All this extra heat ends up in circumpolar air and ocean currents where we percieve a phantom melting of polar ice caps. This melting is part of a chain of processes that sees the additional heat raditaed to space over the poles. No NET melting of the ice caps can or will occur due to these man made interferences with global energy circuitry. Humankind is ultimately insignificant-in-regards-to-total-global-energy-equations.

*The simple way to maintain current-economic-agendas and reduce interference with global energy circuits is to increase water basins (EWBs) over land areas. If done properly, in a strategic manner this implicitly prevents erosion and oceanic siltation plus it will prevent polluted wastewater runoffs as EWBs are fundamentally BIOREACTORS that can purify wastewaters to a level compatible with minimal downstream-catchment and oceanic-thermodynamic-disturbances.

*The worst thing that can happen is to continue focusing oh GG warming while oceanic pollution increases exponentially with modern trends to coastal urbanisation-agriculture-and-mining.
Posted by KAEP, Wednesday, 12 April 2006 5:02:03 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The pseudo science that asserts that global warming is a real threat is of very poor quality indeed.

1. The scientific consensus rates water vapour as at least as important a greenhouse gas as CO2. Dr Vincent Gray (an expert reviewer for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]) has calculated that water vapour accounts for as much as 92% of the greenhouse effect.

2. Many of the main assumptions underlying the IPCC mathematical models are simply invalid. Carbon dioxide has been growing at nothing like the one per cent per annum postulated by the IPCC, and methane is actually reducing. Some models assume that Rwanda and Mali will be more prosperous than the USA and that coal production will increase eleven fold by the year 2100. Both of those assumptions are truly wild.

3. The IPCC predictions have not been amended in the light of actual data and those models have not yet been successfully run backwards.

4. The summaries of IPCC reports are politically inspired, and are not supported by the main body of the reports.

5. The quality of the raw micro level data used by climate alarmists is often abysmal. Missing data are inserted arbitrarily. Data that do not conform to the prejudices of the gatherer are frequently jettisoned. Overall, those data are little more than worthless. See Michael Crichton's testimony to the USA Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works 28 September 2005.

LK
Posted by LKG, Tuesday, 20 June 2006 12:20:15 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 22
  7. 23
  8. 24
  9. Page 25
  10. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy