The Forum > Article Comments > RU486 - something to be said for considered debate > Comments
RU486 - something to be said for considered debate : Comments
By Andrew Laming, published 16/2/2006Where substantial ethical concerns exist, Parliament should retain the option to resume the power delegated to the Therapeutic Goods Adminsistration when required.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 29
- 30
- 31
- Page 32
- 33
-
- All
makes most of your post as fallacious as per normal. I guess
thats all you have, no arguments of substance and you clearly
don't understand the big picture.
As expected, you can't show that I mentioned any BBQ in any
of my posts. The point is not the BBQ, but that you either
deliberately invent whatever, or that your mind is flawed,
or perhaps a bit of both. So much for your credibility!
As a point of interest, not using a spell checker and leaving
the odd typo, is my way of finding out who has a trivial mind
and who has the ability to think beyond that.
Read your history as to how both Xtianity and Islam spread
around the world. Both have their share of violence, coersion,
Govt compulsion and brainwashing of children. Its not a pretty
picture.
The 95% argument stands and can be evidenced around the world
every day. There are no large shifts going on between the various
major religions.
I have good reasons for critising the Vatican. Their role should
be to preach to their flock, not to try to force non Catholics
to live by their dogma, using polical force as the vehicle.
Highlighting the fact that Catholic dogma is actually causing
much suffering in the third world, is well overdue. As a humanist
I believe in less suffering, not more.
If you want to give people dignity Meg, making them suffer more
is not the way to go about it, its bad philosophy and nothing
more then absurd dogma.
You are as much a killing machine as any other woman Meg. You
flush your little human egg down the toilet every month. It
dies. Even you accept that parents can only feed and clothe
so many children