The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > The case for assimilation > Comments

The case for assimilation : Comments

By John Stone, published 19/8/2005

John Stone argues the government must address Australia's growing Muslim problem.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 18
  7. 19
  8. 20
  9. Page 21
  10. All
Democracy in the West shuts its eyes as Muslim women are enslaved. Pt1
At last, a polititian with some backbone. Bronwyn Bishop should be applauded instead of being vilified for her stance against the hijab, a political prop, designed to promote gender apartheid, a weapon of visual terrorism, the symbol of a totalitarian ideology inspired more by Nazism and Communism . It is as symbolic of Islam as the Mao uniform was of Red China.
Clash of cultures? You bet!
WESTERN SECULAR CULTURE: Equality of the sexes, freedom of speech (as long as it doesn't advocate the destruction of Western secular culture - freedom of speech should not be a death-wish), religious freedom (including the choices of having no religion [Atheism], apostacy [leaving a religion] and changing one's religion), democracy etc.
ISLAM: Misogynist practices (women are made subordinate to men, are useful only as servants, sex objects, punching-bags and children machines, and are subjugated in the name of God), NO criticism of Islam or Mohammed (or death will be your reward), NO religious freedom (religious minorities in Muslim lands are called Dhimmis and are second class citizens who are faced with prejudice and social exclusion and have to pay "protection-money" called the jizyah - a kind of tax, plus, if you're an apostate, you're dead!), democracy is seen as man-made ( in fact, Shi'ites in Iraq, are now being branded "apostates and polytheists" by Sunni/Wahhabi clerics and jihadis and are being slaughtered for having elections) and therefore incompatable with the "divine" law of Allah - Shari'a law - amputation for theft, stoning, lashing and public hanging/beheadings for "crimes against modesty", blood-money, honor-killings, eye-gougings and many disgusting practices incompatible with Western belief-systems. CONT. NEXT POST
Posted by Skid Marx, Wednesday, 31 August 2005 12:23:50 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Democracy in the West shuts its eyes as Muslim women are enslaved. Pt2
According to Islamic Shari'a, women do not have political rights.Women suffer restrictions that are quite severe; in some places they cannot even leave their homes without their husband's permission. Their testimony is disallowed in cases of a sexual nature, even if they are raped.
The claim that the hijab is an essential part of the Muslim faith is totally false.
The hijab has nothing to do with Islam as a religion. It is not sanctioned anywhere in the Qur'an or the hadith .
This headgear was invented in the early 1970s by Mussa Sadr, an Iranian mullah who had won the leadership of the Lebanese Shi'ite community.
In an interview in 1975 in Beirut, Sadr said that the hijab he had invented was inspired by the headgear of Lebanese Catholic nuns..... Sadr's idea was that, by wearing the headgear, Shi'ite women would be clearly marked out, and thus spared sexual harassment, and rape, by Yasser Arafat's Palestinian gunmen who at the time controlled southern Lebanon.
The Muslim women's arguments that "free choice" is relative when you are psychologically, financially and socially dependent on your family, clan or religious group seem to fall on deaf ears. The populations of battered Muslim women in "tolerant" Canada's women's shelters seem to be ignored. In Canada, battered Muslim women say that their husbands told them that it is a God-given right to hit them.
The theory of multiculturalism in Western liberal democracies is working against women in ethnic and religious minorities with misogynist practices. Most of all, it shows how many of those who consider themselves liberal or left-wing see their energy levels rise when it comes to Bush-bashing, but lose their voice when women's rights are threatened by religious obscurantism.
I dunno about you, but I'm with Bronnie. Let's show these poor, brainwashed, Muslim women REAL freedom and ban hijabs, burkas, chadors etc. All Muslims who don't like it will be free to migrate to "Muslim lands".
Posted by Skid Marx, Wednesday, 31 August 2005 12:26:15 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Skid Marx,
I agree!
Posted by Philo, Wednesday, 31 August 2005 11:23:11 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
If the "Muslim issue" were unique to one country or if there were also "Hindu" or "Christian" immigration issues, then this discussion would not only be pointless, but wrong. However, like Mary, there seems to be something about Islam ...

Of course, we all know how peaceful Muslim are and how tolerant and honest they can be. Needless to say, Islamic societies are the most just and happiest nations on earth. And nobody respects human rights like Islam!

Anyway, the reason for this post is to share todays main item on Fjordman's blog. He has a great post called "Will Muslim Immigration Trigger War in Europe?" at:
http://fjordman.blogspot.com/

As you see, Islam is an equal opportunity hater and trouble maker. from the Phillipines to India, Australia, Europe, Nigeria, the USA, Canada and even Australia wherever you find Islam with other peoples and religions, you find trouble. Do the math: the more Muslims, the more problems.

Fjordman says...

(Quote) The situation becomes even worse when we enter another factor: Islam. The Islamic world is at war with pretty much everybody, everywhere. Both Thailand and the Philippines, countries where the Muslim population is not much larger than it is in some Western European countries, are facing war. Even Norway, a country with no colonial history and a Muslim population of only 2-3 %, has already experienced shootings to intimidate critics, gang fights, terror threats and attempted terror attacks, as well as visits from supporters of bin Laden. It's pretty amazing that such a small population group can create so much instability. And it's not a good omen for the future. As Herr Unswedenizer wrote to Bjørn in the other thread:

Actually, the burden of proof is on your side. Why should Norway be any different from, let's say Thailand? Everywhere in the world where muslims become 10-20% or more of the population, a war is started. What makes you think that Norway is so very special? (UNQUOTE)

Of course, it is just the rest of the world that is wrong - never Islam.

Read the whole page. Good stuff!

John Kactuz
Posted by kactuz, Thursday, 1 September 2005 6:44:53 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
how true kaktuz
Posted by meredith, Thursday, 1 September 2005 6:55:41 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 18
  7. 19
  8. 20
  9. Page 21
  10. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy