Please provide references, Leo.
Carter does not knock out the science of climate change.

Temperature increasing can be identified in the environment .. permafrost thawing in tundra areas shows temperature increasing. For permafrost to thaw temperatures need to be high over an extended period. Greening in such areas being a result; also lakes, ponds, and marshes are formed. Seasons are changing which have an impact on the feeding habits of migratory birds.
The surf being up in Barrow, Alaska as the ice barriers in the Arctic Ocean have been lost.

Glaciers around Earth are disappearing. There are a few that are increasing; with higher temperatures snow has more volume in comparison to powder snow. It is something that downhill skiers are well aware of.

My theme here is to make it very clear to you; Leo, that higher temperatures causes snow and ice to melt. If you thought about it rather than contemplate how abusive you can be, you might agree that snow and ice do need higher temperature to melt or thaw.

Provide RESEARCH Leo, not commentary from Carter or Duhamel.

It is not the first time I have posted Carter’s impeccable science, which demolished the IPCC’s flawed science on human emissions.
Just to remind you of how he dealt the death blow to the flawed assertion of the IPCC, almost 10 years ago:Carter said:
“Over the last 16 years, global average temperature, as measured by both thermometers and satellite sensors, has displayed no statistically significant warming; over the same period, atmospheric carbon dioxide has increased by 10%.
Large increases in carbon dioxide have therefore not only failed to produce dangerous warming, but failed to produce any warming at all. Hypothesis fails.
2. During the 20th century, a global warming of between 0.4̊C and 0.7̊C occurred, at a maximum rate, in the early decades of the century, of about 1.7̊C/century. In comparison, our best regional climate records show that over the last 10,000 years natural climate cycling has resulted in temperature highs up to at least 1̊C warmer than today, at rates of warming up to 2.5̊C/century.
In other words, both the rate and magnitude of 20th century warming falls well within the envelope of natural climate change. Hypothesis fails, twice.
3. If global temperature is controlled primarily by atmospheric carbon dioxide levels, then changes in carbon dioxide should precede parallel changes in temperature.
In fact, the opposite relationship applies at all time scales.”
The flea pretends that he is too stupid to remember the science which demolished the so called science upon which he relied, but even the flea could not be so stupid. He has no science to show any measurable human effect on climate.
Same old loser, aren’t you, flea?No science, just dishonesty.

Leo

You have not provided research Leo.
You present opinions.
Please provide research!!

As stated earlier, the environment displays warming.

You cannot even provide a coherent post, can you flea.
I provided science, showing that you have none
Bye, crap for brains, I will waste no more time on you.

Leo

Abuse does not provide any references to RESEARCH.

The IPCC is tenacious in its fraud promotion, and asserts that human produced CO2 causes climate change despite the fact that they have no science to show any measurable human effect on climate.
They have no science, only dishonesty.
“No one knows what will really happen. We can’t see the future. We know CO2 is increasing relentlessly, yet temperatures are not. If you believe in the IPCC models, then you need worldwide temperatures to start going up, and soon. A few more hurricanes wouldn’t hurt, either. If you agree that solar activity primarily drives climate changes, then you will probably agree with the current scientific consensus outside the IPCC and with the conclusions of a recent metastudy on temperature forecasts: one degree C of warming this century, plus or minus one degree. That’s the 90%-confidence prediction at this point, but there’s always a chance that they are wrong, or that things will change unexpectedly. We’ll know a lot more in another twenty years or so.
https://medium.com/@pullnews/what-i-learned-about-climate-change-the-science-is-not-settled-1e3ae4712ace