The Forum > Article Comments > The second person of the Trinity: the Son > Comments
The second person of the Trinity: the Son : Comments
By Peter Sellick, published 11/10/2017If a kindly Father God was looking down from above ready to intervene for his Son he must have turned aside so as not to see.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Page 25
- 26
-
- All
You said earlier that you did not want to debate the errors in the bible because you did not want to harm my faith. I thank you for that kind of kindness. It seems like I'm at a similar point now, where discussing Hinduism and Christianity potentially could harm your faith. If I go too far let me know and I'll stop. I don't want to harm you anymore then you want to harm me. None the less how can I teach you if you don't think the bible is reliable? How can you teach me if I don't think Hinduism is trustworthy?
I hope you can forgive that last part but to go further, there's a difference between Hinduism and Christian teachings that I can't ignore. That being that 1) if Chrustianity is right then Jesus is the only way to God. And 2) Jesus's teachings (as well as the old Testiment in the bible) of condemning a false witness, and in general a liar.
If these two elements have merit then, though you can accept my faith based on it being focused on God, I can't give the same kind of acceptance because of the first issue. With the second issue I can't reccomend for you to accept Christianity because if you see it as based on a lie then I can't in good conscience try to teach a lie if I am against lies. Nor should I recommend that you believe me if you believe it came from a lying source.
(...Continued...)