The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Precarious, unsafe and socially inadequate > Comments

Precarious, unsafe and socially inadequate : Comments

By John Tomlinson, published 23/2/2017

What do we want, precarious, unsafe and socially inadequate employment, poverty, categorical- means-tested welfare and downward envy or a universal basic income?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All
A universal basic income to replace medicare, social security and education is a fabulous idea. It just needs to be gauged around housing and land area, so if a man is unemployed he has enough land to provide his own food and water, etc.
Posted by progressive pat, Thursday, 23 February 2017 9:47:47 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hi Pat,

Yes, if the only people who worked were those with some sort of pathological craving, some obsession, with doing something, then the rest of us could live off the taxes they would be required to pay. Sweet ! So how much would you like fortnightly for the rest of your life ?

But you raise the spectre of effort, when you write that '...... if a man is unemployed he has enough land to provide his own food and water, etc.'

You need to realise that such a proviso sort of defeats the purpose of a workless life, don't you think ?

Seriously, contra Tomlinson, ways have to be found for every able-bodied person to be gainfully employed, or generating their own income from utilising their skills some other way. One section of society having to carry another, has never really worked equitably anywhere, and it usually is disastrous for the non-workers if they had to fill in another eight or ten hours every day with some sort of activity.

It would be great if someone with courage did some extensive research comparing the experiences of, say, a hundred workers, and a hundred non-workers, in germs of their role-modelling effect on the education of their kids, on their health, levels of domestic violence, use of grog and drugs, level of involvement with petty crime, etc. Perhaps also, in the long-term, on their life-expectancy, morbidity and hospitalisation, dependence on pharmaceuticals, etc. Do you reckon their would be measurable differences, and in which direction - would workers suffer the negative effects of work, if there were any, OR would the non-workers suffer more from the effects of idleness ? But of course for a shorter time, since their life expectancy would be so much shorter ?

But of course, we don't need to take valuable time doing some longitudinal research - we have a real-life human experiment before our eyes: remote Aboriginal communities, versus, say, urban, working Aboriginal populations in, let's say, Sydney. That would control for much of the 'Aboriginal' factor. What do you reckon you might find ?
Posted by Loudmouth, Thursday, 23 February 2017 10:15:54 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
A UBI is a bit like cutting company tax rates: it is an extremely expensive way of meeting an objective that could more easily be met by much cheaper means.

It also runs the risk of encouraging more people to give up finding work, so reducing the number of people who are paying for it and thus increasing the burden on the rest.

You acknowledge it's "one of many alternatives" so why are you so obsessed with that one rather than the others?
Posted by Aidan, Thursday, 23 February 2017 10:20:11 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Ho hum, more economic illiteracy from the infantile squalling retards of the left.

Why not just make everything "free", John? Think how socially adequate that would be!
Posted by Jardine K. Jardine, Thursday, 23 February 2017 11:10:47 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I see several problems with UBI, because the author wants it to be administered by the state. Yet if as Pat suggests, it will replace Medicare, social-security, education and may I also add IR-laws, then it can be quite good on balance. Still, I rather see the UBI administered by a charity, so that we are allowed to open our hearts and express our goodwill to our fellow-humans, this while compulsory taxes only tend to close down our hearts.

Dear Aidan,

«A UBI is... an extremely expensive way of meeting an objective that could more easily be met by much cheaper means.»

Yes and it will be great to hear from you about the alternative ways, but shouldn't we first agree on the objective?

My objectives for UBI are:
* Eliminate the stress of having to look for jobs under fear of indignity and starvation.
* Eliminate the stress of pretending to look for a job and all the bad energy around it.
* Eliminate the horrors of Centerlink.
* Eliminate the tyranny of bad bosses.
* Eliminate the moral compromises that people have to make when working on jobs or assigned tasks which they find useless or even harmful.
* Eliminate crimes committed out of hunger.

«It also runs the risk of encouraging more people to give up finding work»

I don't consider this a risk, but rather a good thing. Most people would still be sufficiently encouraged to find a job because they like to have comforts and luxuries rather than just subsist. Reducing the number of job-seekers will encourage employers to try harder to entice people with jobs that are more useful, meaningful and ethical. It will be excellent to see many useless and harmful jobs go!
Posted by Yuyutsu, Thursday, 23 February 2017 11:33:43 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
While some of us may agree with some of that defeatist attitude analysis. Not necessarily most of the conclusions nor remedies.

The third poorest in the world, Philippines is a classic example of how not to run an economy, where for example, social welfare is almost non existent and where you need a degree to flip burgers at McDonalds!

Social justice/equity must be afforded and paid for! And only available in the 21st century through a social compact! And wealth creation no longer dependant on endless population growth!

They tried that in the Philippines and just created need and mouths to feed! And where we are headed, with the greed is good dummies at the helm.

Instead we need an inclusive model that makes the economy our slave, rather than as at present, visa versa!

We need to end unearned privilege, in the knowlege and understanding, that too many blodsucking parasites and you recreate a Philippine style economy right here, with the extremely rich or moderately wealthy, underlined by the great unwashed poor and a crime wave of unimaginable proportions!

And where any display of wealth or bling makes you a target! And where extended families are all too often the only social welfare! And where some things are more expensive there than in the west, to reduce importation demand?

Somebody needs to make and share the wealth first, before we can have affordable social equity! I'll elaborate shortly. TBC.
Alan B.
Posted by Alan B., Thursday, 23 February 2017 12:16:25 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The trashing of penalty rates just rendered the poor, poorer. This is Government concern for the excluded, highlighted.

There is a relentless attack on the poor in Western economies. Cost of living is outstripping the ability of low wage earners to remain in the economy, and exist at an acceptable standard to ensure self respect and the feeling of inclusion.

Before any innovation such as suggested in this article, much more urgent action is necessary in other fields under Government control.
The first priority is to have available "meaningful" productive employment for those in our communities unskilled and basically educated.
Redesigned hand-outs do not inclusion produce.

The Western economies carry an over-abundance of the wealthy and the well educated.
And a growing class of people heading in the opposite direction.
Treating this group of people officially, which governments do, by ignoring their concerns for housing and their need for inclusive employment, as second-class citizens, is rendering this group to long term poverty and social dislocation. The fruits of this ignorance are large before us.

And having the US Labour Party, the Democrats, through Clintons glib branding of this group as the "deplorables", advertises to this large and growing group, that any reliance on Government acknowledgment of their plight, is not and will not be forthcoming from any direction but protest! Arise Donald Trump! (Or Reincarnated Hitler), if this situation is not reversed.

No, more handouts will not cut the mustard!
Posted by diver dan, Thursday, 23 February 2017 12:57:20 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
For starters we need an energy policy that enriches us as opposed to profit gouging, debt laden foreign speculators!

We need a tax policy and quite massive reform that returns fairness and equity, as well as obliging any who make profits here pay as much tax as anyone else as a percentage of income! So they no longer lean on the tax paying lifters!

Energy needs to be returned to the much more affordable public ownership model or cooperative enterprise. Rather than left as something we outsource to price gouging foreign investment.

Foreign investment is fine, always providing, it no longer includes foreign control! Along with the accompanying tax avoidance and profit repatriation!

We could be buried under a veritable mountain of foreign investment with the right paradigm! i.e., thirty year self terminating government guaranteed self terminating bonds, and where modest returns could be offset by a tax free status.

Moreover, we'd be no worse off in any way, given none of this money is earning tax or income for our economy, just, anywhere else but here.

Investment money and income earning assetts to support it, is key, along with vision and the courage essential to usher it all in.

Where for starters, peaceful nuclear energy (molten salt thorium) must be on the rationalist's table, as an absolute, along with a completely and profoundly resuscitated manufacturing sector that would enable.

Followed by new reliable income earning water projects that effectively drought proof our food production capacity.

That would be a good start, with more to follow, including complete income earning energy independence, which would then underpin a twentieth century, metals smelting/heavy industry/cooperative enterprise.

And given an inclusive paradigm, supported by an enduring social compact and the return of our economic sovereignty. Then and only then, the only way left is up! And none of it available to a nation led by dummies obsessing soley over power and privilege! And engaged in endless time wasting blame shifting/completely smart smug useless oneupmanship!

Something they do exceptionally well in the hugely impoverished Philippines!
Alan B.
Posted by Alan B., Thursday, 23 February 2017 1:15:06 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Loudmouth,
You are making the mistake of thinking a policy suggestion right through to all its possible manifestations.
If you were a good socialist you would just jump to the first populist conclusion apparent today and forget about tomorrow.
If there are problems then, you can always think of reasons why the capitalist religious complex is at fault.
Posted by Edward Carson, Thursday, 23 February 2017 2:09:46 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The answer is simple.

Its the idea of giving welfare out in the form of a job instead of in the form of money.
- Double Dole for Full-time work. -
Everyone can take part, including the presently employed who want more hours.
Remove the "I can't get a job" excuse.
Create a culture of employment within the ranks of the unemployed.

Modern Technology can help us achieve it.
Posted by Armchair Critic, Friday, 24 February 2017 12:37:45 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hi Edward,

Thanks for that straw man :)

Sorry, it's been a long time since I was a good socialist :( If I understand your rather convoluted post, you are associating socialism with populism, and in this case you may be right. What sounds easy and worthy can easily be shown to be rubbish, a con. How would UBI be paid for ? Oh of course, tax the top end of town, that should do it: so one populist problem can be solved by another one. Clever.

After a few short years living in an Aboriginal community, I quickly came to the conclusion that there were indeed lifters (most of the men there) and leaners (a handful). It was clear that in any Utopian society where everything was shared, the one thing that wouldn't be was effort: there (it seemed) would always be bludgers, and workers. Maybe anybody who has ever lived in a commune could comment.

Under socialism, say in Russia or China, the pathway for bludgers was through the party: go to meetings, denounce the right classes of people and up you go through the hierarchy. Meanwhile, the genuine workers are out there on the factory floor or in the fields, exhorting their fellow-workers to support the Great Teacher and Leader - and probably being 'extracted' for the slightest criticism of the bludgers.

Well, we've had a combined many hundreds of years of 'real socialism' now, and how did any of it go ? In China, towards capitalism with a vengeance; in Cuba, towards back-to-the-cave; in Russia, towards grinding incompetence; in Cambodia, directly to fascism, do not pass go, do not collect $ 200. Do all Utopias degenerate into fascism ?

All able-bodied people should be working, or training for genuine work. In one of his few honest moments, even Lenin suggested that 'He who does not work, neither shall he eat.' Sounds fair enough. And for that, people may need to democratically organise themselves, but rarely would they need some elite to do the 'thinking' for them while everybody else does the hack-work.

Cheers,

Joe
Posted by Loudmouth, Friday, 24 February 2017 9:20:40 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Could it be that academics are embarrassed at how much they are paid for doing so little, so want the handout extended to all? Nah, of course not, they actually think they are special, & worth what they are paid.

Could it be that so many of them are mathematically challenged, they have no idea of the costs of their ideas? Well of course in these days of "HUNMANITIES" getting most of the budget, it's all pie in the sky stuff.

Could it be that from their ivory towers they have no idea of real life down on the ground? Obviously when they can float pixy dust daydreams like this one.

Then penalty rates! Why should anyone get the same pay for 20 hours as someone else gets for 40? It is just not reasonable.

If you chose to work in a 7 day a week industry, all days are, & should be the same. In the Whitsunday's tourist industry most were working 50 to 70 hours a week for a little less than the award for a week. Many of us averaged a couple of days off a month, & loved it.

I made a mistake once, [yes I know]. I organised the next day off, so I could go to Mackay to buy some shoes, not available locally. I was amused to find Mackay shut because it was Sunday. I had not thought of it, as every day was the same in Airlie Beach.

Now everything is open every day, there is no longer any reason or need for penalty rates. Time they were buried along with the ark
Posted by Hasbeen, Friday, 24 February 2017 11:46:21 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy