The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Intent as the enemy of truth > Comments

Intent as the enemy of truth : Comments

By Jennifer Marohasy, published 9/1/2017

When all 1,655 maximum temperature series for Australia are simply combined, and truncated to begin in 1910 the hottest years are 1980, 1914, 1919, 1915 and 1940.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. All
Larsen B ice shelf is a NASA fraud due to Russian hacking of BoM and Chinese Army cyber war.
" This ice shelf has existed for at least 10,000 years, and soon it will be gone. What is really surprising about Larsen B is how quickly the changes are taking place," Khazendar said. "Change has been relentless."
Putin fakes the Guardian: "Dec 6, 2016 - Both the Arctic and Antarctic experienced record lows in sea ice extent in November, with scientists astonished to see Arctic ice actually ..."
There's no need to read the stupid stuff here:
" In the past, when the climate warmed, the change was accompanied by an increase in greenhouse gases, particularly carbon dioxide. When scientists tried to build climate models, they could not get the models to simulate past climate change unless they also added changes in carbon dioxide levels. Though scientists arenít sure why carbon dioxide levels changed, almost all believe that the shift contributed to altering the climate. Because ice cores also revealed that carbon dioxide levels are much higher today than at any time recorded in the past 750,000 years,". blah blah
Posted by nicknamenick, Monday, 9 January 2017 10:33:16 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Indeed Jennifer, INTENT and or creative accounting/number crunching is indeed the enemy of TRUTH!

Nick cannot have that finger pointed at him, and well said Sir!

I just don't know what your real problem is Jennifer or rather that of the fossil fuel cartel that, reportedly pays some of your research grants?

Could it possibly be, the penny has dropped and some of the brighter minds in said cartel? Have finally woken to the fact that the TRUTH pertaining to THORIUM can no longer be suppressed, with aforethought, criminal cunning and INTENT!

Given the widespread adoption of CHEAPER THAN COAL, CLEANER THAN COAL, SAFER THAN COAL, THORIUM, is the real ENEMY of every current energy provider!?

And should we ever have the testicular fortitude to tell it like it is, i.e., the unmitigated, unadorned TRUTH, Jenny! Your current funding stream would dry completely up as would all fossil fuel
companies revenues!?

And given the INTENT on display in your article? You and your ilk are the real enemy of TRUTH, our nation, our kids, their kids, all humanity and the entire planet!?

Get on U TUBE, google tech talks and Kirk Sorensen; and his evidence based science! Or indeed the other eminent scientists and their irrefutable evidence laden TRUTH!
Minus any manipulation of the maths? Too clever by half, INTENT Moresy!?
Alan B.
Posted by Alan B., Monday, 9 January 2017 10:33:45 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Oh Dear I truly wonder how Jenifer could use the term post-truth science with a straight face. From someone so bad a science that she can't get a job as a scientific researcher and has to work as attack dog at the institute of made up stuff.

Jenifer knows quite well the method the BOM uses and that it is consistent with standard excepted practice. to represent it in any other way to demonstrates that you're willfully misleading your readers.

Don't worry Jenifer when the IPA has tired of you, when what remaining credibility is completely gone. You can always get a job with the creationist. They are always looking for "scientist" who are willing to dismiss the work of entire fields of science because it doesn't fit their world view.
You just have to decide if you're going to jump straight into the flat earth 7 days creation stuff or ease your way down to that via intelligent design.
Posted by Cobber the hound, Monday, 9 January 2017 10:59:50 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
oh by the way for those playing at home, hare is a link to how the BOM do it. http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/current/events/january-heatwave-methods.shtml

If Jenifer had some valid to contribute to the scientific methodologies no doubt we will see a paper from her published in a relevant journal. If her proposed methods are better then her peers then eventually they will be the ones used. That's how science works.

The state of the climate report can be found here http://www.bom.gov.au/state-of-the-climate/
Posted by Cobber the hound, Monday, 9 January 2017 12:22:19 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Yes Jen you and Roberts are right the rest of the world is wrong just the usual rubbish from the cherry picking Jen and the hear in the sand claque
Posted by John Ryan, Monday, 9 January 2017 12:37:48 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
hear in the sand claque " people applauding on a beach".
Posted by nicknamenick, Monday, 9 January 2017 12:46:45 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy