This article does not progress the argument one little bit.
Peter Sellick

All we need to do is accept the fact that Jesus Christ was earthly, and he brought the message that Western values and beliefs are based on. This 'there is a God', there is not a God', business is a complete waste of time. No living human being can possibly know whether or not God exists, and the dead human beings haven't sent any messages back to us yet.

'You are dead right - science has not got all the answers and probably never will have them all. '

Oh madmick so the science is not settled. Tell that to the irrational secular fundamentalist.

'Belittling those who are working to expand human knowledge and comparing them to believers in magic is ridiculous.'

no madmick but exposing stupidity in the name of science is worthwhile as masses of tax payer money is used to fill the pockets of those who hold to such blind faith. They are first to criticise any funding for faith but then display such blind bigotry.

The proposition that a God-a supreme being, created the universe, and all its contents including human intelligence just begs the question. I will submit that postulating a theistic explanation has zero information content and is no explanation at all.
Firstly, the well-known problem of who designed God and how was God designed? This is of course unanswerable.
Secondly, what was the mechanism of creation? How did the act of creation work? Did God do the creation unaided, or did he have an army of helpers such as angels and archangels?
So I claim that the God theory does not provide an answer to any of the issues raised by Don Batten. I have no difficult in accepting the thesis that ‘human understanding is limited.’ It matters not a jolt to the way I live my life; if the Universe was created by a big bang, or a God waving his magic hands.

"While it is possible to be a Christian and believe in an old earth, it would indicate that one has either not thought through the consequences, or that the Bible is not the ultimate authority for one’s faith." Don, from his Creation Ministries site.

I'm sorry Don but as a young earther you don't get to lecture anyone on science. You have lost that right.

The world is not 6,000 years old however you are perfectly entitled to believe it is. It is just that neglecting to mention this level of kookiness in your article is rather disingenuous don't you think?

you would think that pig headed evolutionist who have had to change their pseudo faith numerous times and having been exposed as fraudsters will crawl in a hole. Never an apology for their fantasy being uncovered just hoping people will forget their dishonesty. No just like warmist whose predictions have proved totally wrong and fraudulently they just dig in deeper. The Scriptures describe them very accuratley.