The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > No shades of grey > Comments

No shades of grey : Comments

By Paul Russell, published 3/3/2015

Dr Paul Dunne offered a stinging rebuke to the pro-euthanasia lobby, many of whom, he contended, 'deliberately confuse euthanasia with current lawful medical practice...'

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. All
Extremely cogent and well argued, with fact!

The newest pain remediation, as I understand it, comes from the marine environment and is said to be a thousand times more efficacious than morphine.

The only real drawback is that it is incredibly addictive! However, hardly a problem for the terminally ill!

The the fact essential hydration can be given via the bowel and or the bloodstream; just underlines all the usual, it's taking too dam long arguments!

As someone who survived multiple P.E's, I do understand and from a personal perspective, what bearing unbearable pain feels like!


And lying in hospital after the second round of major spinal surgery; I was routinely kept awake by old dears with much less wrong with them?

Except in their minds where it was blown out of all proportion, and the over worked nurses being run off their feet and treated as these folks personal servants, knew it!

The Canadian and Belgium examples show that this really is a slippy slope and tantamount to state sanctioned murder!

If we need to do anything; it is to remove any ambiguity from the law, where in dealing with unimaginable pain, it may be possible to unavoidably depress the vital life signs enough to prematurely hasten the end for the terminally ill?

People who feel strongly about their rights, should create a living will to ensure they end their days as they would personally prefer; which seems to be all euthanasia advocates are asking for!?
Rhrosty.
Posted by Rhrosty, Tuesday, 3 March 2015 9:56:32 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
“We simply cannot get around the fact that euthanasia laws would violate a prime mandate of a just and fair society to protect all its citizens equally”. This is a quote from the article. But our present laws on euthanasia are exactly what does violate the mandate of a just and fair society to protect all its citizens equally. The state currently is dictating to every citizen how they are permitted to leave this life, when they themselves have decided that the time has come and they want to leave.

The state has no right to do this and in fact does not register “suicide” as a crime at all and presumably already agrees that each of us has the right to choose. Why then do they make a quick and painless exit so difficult and make it at least a minor offence to obtain the wherewithal.

Could it be that our politicians find it too difficult to create the requisite legal framework to prevent individuals hastening the process with their nearest and dearest especially if there is money involved. We should all contact our local member and ensure that a law along the lines of those operating in numerous other countries is enacted as swiftly as possible.
Posted by Dickybird, Tuesday, 3 March 2015 3:15:46 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Euthanasia should be illegal, because it's illegal.

Riiight …
Posted by PaulMurrayCbr, Wednesday, 4 March 2015 12:17:13 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
"putting the needs of others on a par with their own..."

Doesn't that mean letting them die if they want to?
Posted by Jon J, Wednesday, 4 March 2015 7:15:13 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Rhosty & DickyBird - You create an argument for a person to take his/her own life, but not for others to be complicit in that. It is the latter that is of greatest concern. No one likes to see people experiencing pain, but compassion is not sufficient motive to get involved in the deliberate taking of human life. The adverse effects of a law allowing that to happen are too serious: the Netherlands and Belgium are perfect example of the allowance. I stand on the idea that there is no dignity in taking one's own life, and even less in asking others to do so, and plan to live by that as long as I live
Posted by The Ox, Wednesday, 4 March 2015 7:47:43 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy