The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Abbott's way > Comments

Abbott's way : Comments

By Mike Pope, published 23/4/2014

The Australian prime minister Tony Abbott is renowned for calling climate science 'absolute crap'.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 18
  7. 19
  8. 20
  9. Page 21
  10. 22
  11. All
"However, Watts's allegations have been investigated and found to be fallacious."

Who by ant? Do you know what the graph at WUWT shows ant? A comparison between the raw data and the adjusted data. You can't fake that, you can't make it up; the early temps were adjusted down and the latest temps adjusted up. Check it yourself, the data is provided

"acidification has been identified as already happening, nothing academic about that."

Yes there is ant; acidity is measured by PH values; what are they? Do you know at what PH liquid becomes acidic? Again it all boils down to numbers; what are they?

You are a fanatic ant, driven by belief. Nothing will convince you that AGW is BS because you believe in it.
Posted by cohenite, Sunday, 11 May 2014 8:42:21 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
“ NSA Report is 829 pages and referenced by over 3,000 papers. “ This is ant’s comment on the NCA report, the fraudulent document mentioned in my post above which is meant to back up the lies told by Obama in his launch of his climate change initiative. During the questioning of experts by the Senate, Obama’s mendacity was demonstrated. For example” Ranking Member Senator David Vitter (R-LA) asked: “Can any witnesses say they agree with Obama’s statement that warming has accelerated during the past 10 years?” After an awkward (to say the least) silence, Cullen tried to change the subject”
(Cullen was a Democrat nominated expert on the panel)
http://finance.townhall.com/columnists/maritanoon/2013/07/21/why-is-obama-lying-on-climate-change-n1645569/page/full
Although taken to task by the Senate for his lying, he is now backed up by the NCA report, which ant has mistaken for a scientific document.
Scientists who critiqued the document labelled it “pseudoscience.
“Michaels’ and Knappenberger’s 75-page critique of the NCA points out the many weak points and flaws present in the government’s analysis of the impact of global warming. For example, the NCA relies on not only peer-reviewed scientific literature, but also non-peer reviewed work from environmental activist groups — which the government did not disclose.”

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/05/06/dissenting-scientists-label-white-house-climate-report-as-pseudoscience/#ixzz31SS2WaKH

ant does not explain how 3000papers backing up the fraudulent nonsense in the report is relevant in any way except to show that the papers are nonsense.In any event, it appears that many of them are not scientific papers.
Posted by Leo Lane, Monday, 12 May 2014 11:14:21 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Ant has again raised the “ocean acidification” fraud , despite knowing that it is baseless.
The following extract deals with this issue:
“As a matter of fact, seawater is alkaline and basic. Dissolving the carbon dioxide from all the world’s known fossil fuel reserves would never make the sea acidic. The climate alarmists coined the phrase “ocean acidification” to make it sound alarming, whereas the process is actually what is known as neutralization. The term ‘acidification’ of course sounds more scary than talking about the oceans becoming slightly less basic or a little more neutral.
….. There is not the slightest possibility that the oceans could approach the neutral pH of pure water even if all the fossil fuel reserves in the world were burned, so all talk of ‘acid’ oceans is utter nonsense. “
http://buythetruth.wordpress.com/2009/03/19/toxic-seawater-fraud/

ant’s hobby is finding further frauds to support, and boring us with endless irrelevancy on melting ice and inuits.
Posted by Leo Lane, Monday, 12 May 2014 11:17:51 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Antarctic ice was melting, according to ant, owing to the mythical AGW. There has been a record expansion of Antarctic ice, so it appears,ant, that AGW has stopped
“ANTARCTIC sea ice has expanded to record levels for April, increasing by more than 110,000sq km a day last month to nine million square kilometres.
The National Snow and Ice Data Centre said the rapid expansion had continued into May and the seasonal cover was now bigger than the record “by a significant margin’’.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/health-science/antarctic-sea-ice-at-record-levels/story-e6frg8y6-1226913708208#
I am sure ant will find some melting ice somewhere, about which she will continue to post nonsense.
Posted by Leo Lane, Monday, 12 May 2014 3:18:21 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
A Swedish scientist has verified Murry Salby’s work, strengthening another barrier against the baseless AGW fraud

Swedish climate scientist Pehr Björnbom has recently replicated the work of Dr. Murry Salby, finding that temperature, not man-made CO2, drives CO2 concentration in the atmosphere. Dr. Björnbom confirms Salby's hypothesis that the rate of change in carbon dioxide concentration in the air follows an equation that only depends on temperature change, detailed in his report Reconstruction of Murry Salby's theory that carbon dioxide increase is temperature driven

Dr. Björnbom discusses his findings in this post from The Stockholm Initiative[Google translation + light editing]:

Murry Salby, climate science innovator who challenges established views

Murry Salby is a highly qualified and well-respected professor, academic teacher, and climate scientist. He has a series of innovative talks challenging the leading circles representing the IPCC sanctioned culture of consensus in climate science. He presents startling research that fundamentally questions the established views of the IPCC consensus. An important hypothesis times. This result was I able to reproduce, in a report given here.
http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com.au/2013/07/swedish-scientist-replicates-dr-murry.html that he advances is that the atmospheric CO2 rate of change is a function of only the global temperature changes and that this may explain the increase in carbon dioxide from pre-industrial level
Posted by Leo Lane, Monday, 12 May 2014 3:44:37 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Whatever Watts writes is meaningless in relation to what is actually happening, the fact remains that climate change is happening in Alaska.
Major glaciers are retreating in Greenland. Most glaciers are retreating in the US as well.
Newspapers in Alaska do confirm that there are actual changes happening.
Once again how do you explain the slumping that is going on?
How do you explain the coastlines that actually are eroding?
How do you explain the acidification that is occurring?
How do you explain the coastal erosion that is causing Inuits to have to relocate.
How do you explain the epidemiological issues that are being identified?
Posted by ant, Monday, 12 May 2014 8:28:33 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 18
  7. 19
  8. 20
  9. Page 21
  10. 22
  11. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy