The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > GST reform discussion requires facts and analysis, not ideology > Comments

GST reform discussion requires facts and analysis, not ideology : Comments

By Geoff Carmody, published 14/4/2014

Most of the Budget cost of these exemptions does not go to the groups they supposedly are meant to support. It is sprayed increasingly up the income scale.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All
Paul Keating once noted that broadening the tax base meant the many pay more so that the few can pay less. That's not ideology, it's arithmetic. This was borne out soon afterwards when the Liberals imposed a GST on the overwhelming bulk of what everyone spent on daily living while at the same time reducing company tax by 16.6%. Mr Greed has been seeking ever since to make the many pay even more still as the few pay less. Naturally the few don't express it honestly as Mr Keating did but they bury the grab in a whole lot of mealy-mouthed stuff about making the tax system simpler and collecting more revenue.

OK, here's a way to make it simpler. First, abolish the GST, what Tony Abbott would (had he been more honest) have condemned as a "Great Big Tax". Second, restore wholesale sales taxes scaled to address social goals to the direct benefit of the many. Third, load income tax rates to distinguish "personal exertion" and "unearned" income", where personal exertion means personal, hands-on creation of goods and services and "unearned" means earned, but not by the taxpayer.
Posted by EmperorJulian, Monday, 14 April 2014 9:30:01 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Sparkyq has it right, tweak it here tweak it there, make it more complicated, more accountants needed, more tax specialists, more tax lawyers ... nothing much really changes.

The tax act is thousands of pages long. Complication simply allows the unscruplous a hole to hide behind. Scrap income tax, tax land and maybe capital and consumption. The baby, bathwater and bath need to be thrown out.
Posted by Valley Guy, Tuesday, 15 April 2014 4:52:42 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy