The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > SES Better Schools Funding > Comments

SES Better Schools Funding : Comments

By David Robertson, published 19/11/2013

Australian schools need a new funding model that is less complex and more transparent.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. All
The SES model was not “student-focused and based on need”. It ignored school fees. It ignored school income. It ignored school resources. It funded schools on the basis of how well off the students’ neighbours were. It used census collector districts to determine how well off the neighbours were. This immediately penalised low-fee schools in well-off areas. No longer could they be accessible to poorer families.

The Gonski plan keeps the Howard government’s socio-economic status model in place. This is its worst feature. It is akin to varying Medicare rebates according to the wealth of the patients’ neighbours. SES funding penalises low-fee schools that take students form middle class areas and thus socially stratifies our education system. The proposal to calculate the SES level of the neighbours of government school students illustrates the danger in the SES model; viz, that it will lead to means-tested fees in government schools.

The fix required to the Gonski model is to base public funding on the resources the school has, not the wealth of the students’ neighbours.
Posted by Chris C, Tuesday, 19 November 2013 9:52:36 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Conceptually, the school funding issue doesn't seem that difficult. Step one, stop focussing on who owns which schools. Step two fund students, not schools. Each student gets an entitlement to a level of funding equivalent to the contemporary cost of educating a student in a government school. Students who meet specified criteria (eg poverty, disability) receive additional funding but the onus is on the students parents to prove the students meet the criteria.

Parents then choose the school they wish their children to attend. If they choose to spend the extra $20k or more for one of the few so-called 'elite' private schools, that's up to them.

Let's celebrate the diversity of schools in Australia rather than complaining about it and build on what really should be a great source of strength.
Posted by Senior Victorian, Tuesday, 19 November 2013 10:01:53 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
>>Step two fund students, not schools>>

Agreed with one proviso. The funding given to students below age 18 gets added to the parents' taxable income. That way you can afford to make the funding more generous with the children of poorer parents getting most of the added benefit.
Posted by stevenlmeyer, Tuesday, 19 November 2013 6:18:52 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
We have more than enough students, we need apprentices. Let's fund some of them for a change. At least they'll be of benefit to our society unlike the students.
Posted by individual, Wednesday, 20 November 2013 5:51:27 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy