The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Einstein's insanity test > Comments

Einstein's insanity test : Comments

By Junaid Cheema, published 10/10/2012

Perhaps we need to think outside the square on Islamic terrorism.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. ...
  8. 14
  9. 15
  10. 16
  11. All
mac if you are not scientifically literate then perhaps this site may be of help; http://patriotsquestion911.com/ Here you will see thousands of professionals,ex-CIA/FBI ,Govt Officials,entertainers,Doctors,Professors,academics,engineers, scientists,ex-Prime Ministers/Presidents from all around the planet questioning the official story of 911.

The truth needs to come out now,since the Western Oligarchs want escape via a Nuclear war with Russia and China.
Posted by Arjay, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 7:27:43 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
@Kenny - you say:
"And still they strap bombs to themselves and walk into crowds. That is what needs to be focussed on not our reaction to it. No matter how small the number of islamist do it are. while they do it that is what you should be talking about. "

What we should really focus on is the reason behind them doing it. I'm not condoning it, but you should look at the reasons. For example, in Palestine, which they used to own the entire what is now Israel / Palestine we see that in their own country they've been subjugated to almost less than 3rd world treatment. Can't even pass by within there own land @ a checkpoint without being checked etc. Israel building houses within the West Bank etc. Blocking supplies to Gaza, And using unprecendented amount of weapons against the innocent. But if any retaliation whether it's a suicide bomber, as you would know they have hardly any sophisticated weopons like Israel, as US supplies it to them, then we look at them and say oh they're the terrorists? It's subjective media attention and not the truth that we should be looking out. Media can easily make the oppressed look like terrorists.
The amount of UN sanctions that Israel have violated is beyond ridiculous.

Also in Iraq, where Netanyahu said "FOR SURE" Iraq had weopons of massed destruction. Where are they? Where's the condemnation for invading and bombing the country? No lets look at those that defend there country as terrorist? That's insane.

Also 9/11 was clearly an inside job. There was instruction for Building 7 (Next to the twin tours) to be "pull it down"; a term used for detonating. How could that instruction possibly be put out there when it takes months to prepare such a demolition? Also Steel structure could based on science ever melt @ those temperatures they claimed. Where's the thorough investigation? No they just go directly and invade other countries.
Posted by PeacefulPeace, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 8:18:33 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
@Banjo i'll answer you under each section.

@Banjo: Saying offering no suggestions
PeacefulPeace: He did, he said to stop "Sensationalizing" and look at the facts. What's news for one and said about one incident should be given the same attention to another. Seems like you missed a plain and big point..

@Banjo: Do you think we should appease the protestors and introduce Sharia law?

PeacefulPeace: Cheap shot it seems. What's introducing Sharia law have to do with the article? Br. Junaid didn't say he agreed with violent protesting either and i think his points were pretty obvious to understand. Seems like you need to re-read the article.

@banjo: Mentioning 9/11 and terrorism. Muslims are violent people who wish to impose their way on us by threats and violence.

PeacefulPeace - another very stereotypical and generalised statement. What is a terrorist attack? Define Terrorism? Was Americas invasion of Afghanistan an act of Terrorism. Was Americas invasion of Iraq an act of terrorism? Where's the unsubstanttiated evidence that Saddam had weapons of massed destruction? As far as i'm aware they havn't found any. Wasn't that the reason for attacking in the first place? Muslims are not violent people but if you attack anyone within there own country what do you think is going to happen? Similarly in England if we look at the riots which occurred recently, do we take that and say England are violent people? Or priests molesting kids, do we say all priests molest there kids? And who was involved in WW1, WW2 Muslims? killing how many? Also many other terrorist attacks too many to go through here.

@Banjo: I have a couple of suggestions regarding Australia.

1. Get tougher about violent protests and arrest more. Hasher laws for that behavior.

As long as there's no special treatment to non-muslims that's OK.

@Banjo: 2. Stop further immigration or those groups that will not integrate and hold our society in contempt.

How would you define/measure someones integration potential? Holding society in contempt referring to who?
Posted by PeacefulPeace, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 8:40:43 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Great article. Unfortunately, throughout history it has always been easy to control people by making them afraid of some enemy. The more the 'enemy' appears to be the other and different the easier it is.

The Catholic Irish were lucky that they are not different enough from the British to have suffered a similar fate as do Muslims now. Anybody who lived in the UK in the 80's at the height of terrorist attacks in the UK would remember the real and constant fear of a bomb attack. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eR1VePIeWbE is just a reminder of the seriousness of the threat.

To research the history of terrorism in recent history is interesting. Just start with the terrorist attacks by the supporters of creating a state of Israel. Here's a recent reflection from an Israeli paper on the bombing of the King David Hotel.
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/the-spirit-of-the-king-david-hotel-1.193571

It is always a challenge for a society how to deal with terrorism. Brushing every single person with the same belief or race with the same brush and assigning them the part of 'the enemy' is a sure fire way to failure.
Posted by yvonne, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 8:50:46 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Another excellent site if you want to know the truth and reality is ;
http://globalresearch.ca/
Posted by Arjay, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 9:24:34 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
@mac
"People might be angry and outraged at the exercise of free speech but that's their problem"
Then why the outrage at a bunch of bearded Australians expressing their democratic right to protest and exercising their right to free speech?

"How should non-Moslems behave if Moslems are offended" perhaps a more pertinent question to ask for the enlightened minds in a liberal democracy would be "How should a human behave if other humans are offended"
Posted by Hadi, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 10:37:53 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. ...
  8. 14
  9. 15
  10. 16
  11. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy