The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Fourth estate in fine state > Comments

Fourth estate in fine state : Comments

By Jim Wallace, published 20/4/2012

The Press Council is supposed to guarantee journalistic standards, not undermine them.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. Page 8
  10. All
great one eric
you make claim to knowledge but cant find a few questions
'let alone reply them

mate that 4 th estate used to have 'the latest mising link'' etc[claims it made life..lol..and then that absurd claim of evolution]

but your reply give me all i need to know
pretenders dwell ammoung us[make high claim..then run and hide]

have a nice life avoiding truth
don t claim science if you cant validate genus changing

what was this cold/blood fish...fins scales COLD BLOOD
non mammal..that evolved into a warm blood fury critter[mammal]

half cold/half hot
its insane..not one change of genus has..been recoded EVER

you say over time...lol
thats science?

mate have you even botherd looking at the theory
it works within its genus..[specie microvevolving..within their genus

like lomngbeaked finches..or short[dependent on weather]
dry= more short beaked..wet=more long beaked[both..still finches]

your nates lie to the press
they think you lot know

itsa not the media
its you

present fact[science
the theory is fraud]

the emporer [evolution out of genus]..wears no clothes

tell me cleveer guy
how many..*f1..not non parental genus you breeed

not one
billions of mutations within genus
not one ever proof of evolving into new one

stop lying to the press
[their to sucked into the scam to care]
but i need the facts*..the proof..[and there aint none]

you got none
or you would look so clever ...presenting it
instead of critiqing my spelling..[i was too busy breeding critters..not one was not,.*the same [parental genus]..

the same as what you have[nuthing]
its a lie..sold by the 4 th estate/mate
u got nuthin

stop lying to yourself..and the forum
you made claim..back it up
Posted by one under god, Thursday, 26 April 2012 3:22:32 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
one under god, your replies are way off topic, but more than that, completely unintelligible (Google translate?).
Posted by AI, Thursday, 26 April 2012 3:28:59 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
ericgee/quote..""Ps. A falsifiable witness
would be a false witness,..ie wrong not right""

mate faulsify[to those who know science]
is that deefinitive statement..that if refuted..refutes the theory

to talk banalities of faulsifyable witness
that could be a witness..WHO IF REFUTED..refutes his words

none have been refuted
now give science

no one likes
those who avoid revealing fact
when fact is called for...they righfully or wroingfully
think no fact...no proof..distyraction..is this claim from liars?

and who could blame them
clearly you made claim..but refused to offer proof

to wit even willing to betray
the high measure for proof..you claim science is held to

not

its revieuwed by peers
your afraid of peer..revieuw?
how about the deciete you not correcting lies puts on your soul?

your post...provides no faulsifiction
PLEASE NAME THOSE FOR EVOLUTION OUT OF GENUS*
[which is sciences big claim..

*with not one ever witnessed./..or observed..

lol''evolving...*away from...their parental genus
what area you study?

we had a guy here did..JUST Eucalypts
another JUST microbes..[NEITHER reported not to genus]

cause thats a faulsifyable [to me]
present one..!..just one..

[not miss named...or revised.
.just any old..lol..[NEW* .genus]

with proof
name names
1st life=genus?
2de life-genus?

you got nuthin..except..FAITH..in a theory*

admit i
Posted by one under god, Thursday, 26 April 2012 3:51:49 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Jim, even "Under one God" has no idea what your argument is towards homosexuals, your antisocial attitude towards others that do not conform to your belief; makes you truely unchristian.
Posted by Kipp, Thursday, 26 April 2012 8:19:50 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
eric/quote//""You seem to suggest..some theories
have been busted//when they have had a new lease of life..""

ohcdear taxomony is frraud
phenotype DONT MEAN geno=type
or indeed and gene relatgion..[taxonomy is dead..hung on its own lies]

try these two[links]
horible deformities

[survival of the fittest ..ensures none shall survive]
they cant breed fertile young..outside their genus limit/bounds

but tell me
see the pictures?

any new genus there?
phenotypically?

we know the genotype.=same genus
BUT*?

i don the mutation thing too
still ...*only got the same..genus as parents

oh the links
sorry
http://enenews.com/state-officials-shut-down-shrimping-in-gulf-amid-scientists-finding-deformities-and-horrifying-creatures-media-attributes-closure-to-lesions-then-retracts

but wait
whats this eating bacterie..resistant to poisen
give resistance?
http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2012/04/bugs-pick-up-pesticide-resistance-from-pesticide-eating-bacteria.ars

or this
mutations following fucisheema
all yet the same genus
http://enenews.com/japan-tv-news-program-films-plant-life-mutations-in-tokyo-fasciated-dandelions-reported-very-often-video

mutations or sports...can only mutate within their genes
[unless a virus add's in info[what evolution maxum defines that?]

there is..method for gene duplication..[by polymidy][poly morph]
ok its still all..!with the egsisting gene..

[within the genus averages/limits..
held by their parental genus]

then there is that co opperation...
[symbiology...did these co-evolved from what?
[they both co need each other specificly..[linked to death[death of one will kill the other]

evolution lol

essentialy we are a mouth an anus..and a stomach
with nerves to tell good from waste[one end from the other]
plus..logic/logus...light sustaining life to life to love[see it even in the worst beast..the parents [generally love em]

just like we trust vile bad wrong theories

but proof...and it becomes fact
makes facts[validates facts]..not misssrepresnt
randomised joinders of facts..into a likely theoretical fiction

which is what..your theory has
it has solid bits..of divergent origen
BUT the big clue..is it restas on..feet of clay~

you know less than ten corperations control everything we can buy
http://www.businessinsider.com/these-10-corporations-control-almost-everything-you-buy-2012-4

that is devolution
to the extreme..thats where lies lead!
Posted by one under god, Friday, 27 April 2012 9:37:17 AM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. Page 8
  10. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy