The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > A crisis in international education in Australia > Comments

A crisis in international education in Australia : Comments

By Bradley Christmas, published 19/4/2011

International education is more than a cash cow - it cross fertilises culture, ideas, ideals and goodwill.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All
Hardly a surprising view from a vested interest in the education sector.

One Nigerian medical student wishing to return to Nigeria does no necessarily represent the intentions of the majority of overseas students.

And the interests of universities in securing a funding stream to make up the short fall in government funding are not necessarily aligned with the wider interests of Australian society. I.E. Universities are well funded but generate a stream of first home buyers that push up property prices and the cost of living in general.
Posted by Mr Windy, Tuesday, 19 April 2011 10:02:57 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Sounds a lot like you are saying we should re-open all the visa factories so that you don't lose your job, Bradley. This logic doesn't lend itself very well to your claim that this is a complex multi-dimensional issue that has been reduced to simple pandering to public unease and crude statistics. You've also broken that rule by simplifying the "crude statistics" regarding the $13.7 billion added to the economy. What are the costs in infrastructure, congestion and pollution? Seems like there are some multi-dimensional aspects that need to be covered.

My understanding is that nothing has changed that would reduce the number of Nigerian doctors coming to Australia, the rules have changed to stop people getting hairdressing credentials and then applying for permanent residence. If Australian university education is good enough, then foreign students will continue to come. Nothing has changed about that. The thing that has changed is the visa factories.

If there ever was a long term policy issue it is immigration. Everything about it needs to be considered very carefully for the long term prosperity of Australia and the rest of the world.
Posted by ericc, Tuesday, 19 April 2011 10:26:52 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
A pretty sound recitation of the problems facing the tertiary education sector.

Here are some more:

37 universities teaching much the same stuff
The shoddy treatment of internationals through 'template thinking'
The inability of OZ unis to differentiate themselves in the global education market
The relatively poor research rankings of 75 percent of Oz unis
A ridiculous narcissim by some of the older staff who confuse rights with privilege.
Putting all of their eggs in the international student basket.
Posted by Cheryl, Tuesday, 19 April 2011 11:15:12 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
So more places available for Australian's and less taxi drivers?
Posted by Kenny, Tuesday, 19 April 2011 11:19:40 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Cheryl,

Your first point is an interesting and extremely relevant one.

When I went to uni to become a teacher, I lived in Brisbane. I had a choice of:

The University of Queensland
Queensland University of Technology
Griffith University: Mt Gravatt
Griffith University: Logan
Griffith University: Gold Coast

When I studied law, my options were as numerous. What that means is that our quality educators are spread rather thinly across five or more comprehensive institutions in one city, rather than being focused in one or two top quality law schools. Now, we don't want a situation where our 17 year-olds have to relocate to Sydney or Melbourne to study (I know they have such a situation in the US, but university education there is somewhat more elitist as a result), but we certainly don't need five mediocre courses when one or two good programs would suffice.

One solution - and one that would be very unpopular with the university sector - is to push universities into specialisation. They all do it to a limited degree, but the reality is that the bulk of undergraduates experience very similar learning wherever they go. Five teaching courses in one city have resulted in OP cutoffs around the 17-20 mark in some courses: you can fail high school and still study to teach there.

The Melbourne College of Divinity (say what you will about it) is pushing to become a small-scale specialist university, and is a leader in its field not only in Australia, but on the international scene as well. Maybe other universities should follow?

Of course, regional universities like JCU, CQU, UNE and others may well continue to be comprehensive institutions to cater for the needs of their communities. I suspect that to do so would make it rather hard for them to compete in terms of quality, though.
Posted by Otokonoko, Tuesday, 19 April 2011 12:39:20 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Why are there never any problems any more. There are only crises.
Posted by Houellebecq, Tuesday, 19 April 2011 1:59:24 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
“at its peak in 2007-2008 netted an estimated $13.7 billion”

When will academics stop giving the public misinformation?

Figures such as $13.7 billion are the estimated amounts spent by foreign students while in the country.

It is NOT what they bring into the country, it is what they spend in the country.

If a foregin student works while in the country (and many do) and then they spend the money they earn, this is added into the figure that makes up $13.7 billion.

If an Australian student works and earns money, and then spends that money in Australia, then it should be added to the $13.7 billion as well.

It is the same type of money.

Is there any information from an academic in a so-called Australian university that can be relied upon.
Posted by vanna, Tuesday, 19 April 2011 2:55:11 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Australian Universities increasingly minimise input to students, largely driven by budget. Students spend more time in a class room being spoken to and less in a ‘laboratory’ doing. The Cavendish Laboratories in Rutherford’s time had students in laboratories ‘doing’ physics and learning from physicists for the majority of their time. Which produces excellence?

Given relatively fewer academics and increasing teaching time there is also less contact between the needs of society/industry and University staff. The work undertaken at MIT and institutions such as that is directly addressing the concerns of the world around them and has substantial laboratory time. Who gets support and attracts students?

Australian institutions are less attractive propositions to overseas students as a result. A better education of more direct relevance can be had in other countries than here. The export of education is declining because what we offer is not of the same standards as had elsewhere.

Publications are being directed to A class journals, theoretical pieces lacking application. Academics will concentrate on theory and application will go by the board. How relevant are these to students and why should they support such institutions?

Otokonoko, reference to specialisation and the Melbourne College of Divinity sets a model that needs to be considered. In the Netherlands the government decided Wageningen was to be the only University offering agriculture – it has critical mass to provide stimulating courses and innovative research.

Australia’s education sector principally exists to educate Australian students. There are areas such as photovoltaics at UNSW where finding an Australian student is problematical. Dependency on overseas students therefore icnreases. Universities are ‘drunk’ on fees.

Houellebecq, it is a crisis because it threatens University survival. Fat is anathema in the modern world, yet fat in the system allows survival.
Posted by Cronus, Tuesday, 19 April 2011 3:51:21 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Cronus,

You raise an interesting point about the nature of study - being taught physics rather than doing physics. Among my many university dalliances, I did a semester of biotechnology. I was bored out of my mind, with the bulk of contact time spent in lecture theatres rather than actually engaging with science. We learnt the basics we had already covered in high school (it was expected that participants had studied chemistry and maths, but all else was optional), and we had much less hands-on time. I don't know if this has changed - that was 2001.

Interestingly, a study in the mid 90s (Caiger et al, 1994) - I can find the reference in my notes, but not the article itself - found that the exact opposite was the problem, especially for Asian students. The trend towards 'constructing' knowledge was problematic for people who had paid a lot of money to come to Australia and be taught by experts. They found themselves constructing their own knowledge, making mistakes, hopefully learning from their mistakes and wondering if the 'experts' really were all that they claimed to be. Have we shifted too far in the other direction? Do we have a shortage of experts?

Part of me always wonders if many of the international students in Australian universities are here not because of the high standard of our tertiary education sector, but because our admission requirements are less stringent or our degrees are easier. I always thought it was a bit of a con that the BEd degree I studied was sold exclusively to overseas students as an MTeach, to cater for demands in other countries that teachers have Masters degrees. In that case, it was a Master in name but a Bachelor in nature.
Posted by Otokonoko, Tuesday, 19 April 2011 4:36:22 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Australia’s education sector principally exists to educate Australian students. There are areas such as photovoltaics at UNSW where finding an Australian student is problematical. Dependency on overseas students therefore icnreases. Universities are ‘drunk’ on fees.......and there you have it in a nutshell. Making future Australian investments, beg, borrow and steal, just to make it through? Your putting the TOP shelf, the new leaders, the one,s that will carry the most, pay! More and more over-sea,s people will be recruited, while more Australians students miss-out on what should be there's.

Makes you wonder what they mean by multicultural, doesn't it.

PAYING FOR EDUCATION!.........lol......The Australian Government may as well shoot themselves in the foot while there at it.

And here,s a bigger laugh.....Government State ruined, I mean ran schools:) Yes, and isnt that the biggest load of bullsh!t:)

State schools were fully funded by the government, now my children dont get an education, and there asking me to handed out 1000 dollars....lol...for what? ( and thanks me, I do the rest of the home-schooling.) The poor UNI people....some have to work, study, and pass.....and they haven't even see the HEX/LIVING=PLUS/BILLS that incurs..........and you haven't even got a job yet...lol....thats just amazing!

Imagine! If the best of the best, got the best.....now! wouldn't that be something.

LEA
Posted by Quantumleap, Tuesday, 19 April 2011 5:12:30 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I recall a few years ago that some vice chancellor was on $640,00 a year and he thought it wasn't enough.. How much do some of the other hangers-on get ? Let's get some quality service out of these people before handing them the big cheques. The overseas students must be cackling themselves when see the atrocious spelling in the wider community of this Nation.
Why, even Kellogg's have ceased to put degrees in with their cornflakes.
Posted by individual, Tuesday, 19 April 2011 8:28:22 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Why would you go to a uni which predominantly preaches a CO2 global warming tax, Now proven to be a scam ?
Posted by Dallas, Wednesday, 20 April 2011 3:05:38 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Which uni is that, Dallas?
Posted by Otokonoko, Wednesday, 20 April 2011 9:59:21 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy