The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > An Act of Negligence > Comments

An Act of Negligence : Comments

By Sophie Trevitt, published 24/1/2011

How many more have to suffer before we decide to do something about limiting CO2 emissions?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. Page 8
  10. 9
  11. All
One activity in which Sophie could usefully indulge, is to review the scientific literature to find a paper that provides scientific evidence that anthropogenic CO2 emissions have caused a measurable increase in global warming. If she finds one, she could be in the running for a Nobel Prize.
Posted by Raycom, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 10:51:36 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Such arrogance to think that humans can dictate the weather. Maybe if we can discover how to keep a marriage vow we might just improve the world a little. This Green faith is destructive and yet still gets funded. There are very few 'true believers' in man made climate change as seen by the lifestyle of those preaching their ever changing faith.
Posted by runner, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 11:12:31 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
As opposed to you preaching yours, eh runner? ;)
Posted by Clownfish, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 1:40:48 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Nature is doing the climate changing. Man is just supplying the pollution.
Posted by a597, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 2:13:09 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Ozandy & others,
Perhaps you are in a position to find out.
The IPCC climate model has been run against data varying from business
as usual linear increase and two lower levels of fossil fuel burning.

However the Uppsala University's Global Energy Research Group has
produced figures with more realistic values of oil, gas and coal
availability significantly lower than the IPCC's figures.

I suggest you all take a Bex and have a nice lie down and wait to see
what the IPCC produces in the way of temperature rise using the new data.

They have been so long giving any indication that they have used these
new data that I am becoming suspicious that they have used the data
and really do not want to admit the results.

Imagine the uproar and loss of jobs if the new data shows that it all
is a big panic over nothing.

Just to look at a microcosm of such a result in the Australian
parliament !
They would have to deliberatly ignore the result, just as they ignore
the fact of peak oil in 2006.
Posted by Bazz, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 3:59:47 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Keith,

There's no apostrophe in 'meant'.

I'm pretty damn sure you knew exactly what was intended by comment about common sense, and you're just playing silly buggers.

And if you're going to split hairs, I'm going to piss off.
Posted by Aleister Crowley, Sunday, 30 January 2011 1:53:19 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. Page 8
  10. 9
  11. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy