The Forum > Article Comments > Gay marriage - it’s all about the child > Comments
Gay marriage - it’s all about the child : Comments
By David van Gend, published 24/11/2010The most serious objection to gay marriage is that it means gay parenting, and gay parenting means depriving a child of either his mother or his father.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Page 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
-
- All
Posted by Clownfish, Sunday, 28 November 2010 4:45:26 AM
| |
<<Some moral algebra:>>
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=11272#190412 Some immoral canardery actually. <<Doesn't sound so defensible when you exchange 'gay' for 'interracial', does it?>> The false analogy trotted out yet again to fool the gullible. Race is genetically predetermined. Homosexuality is not genetically predetermined. Race is immutable. Sexual behaviour is not immutable. If the diversity of all the races can be applied to the concept of racial equality why do homosexual activists exclude the diversity of all the sexualities from their demands for "equality"? ie Why do they discriminate against incestuous marriage, child marriage, polygamous marriage and bestial marriage? Trouble is, if they didn't discriminate, then everybody would twig to what was going on. To be a hypocrite or to be inclusive? What a dilemma. Ultimately pragmatism rules the day. Lies, personal attacks, hypocrisy. Whatever it takes. Posted by Proxy, Sunday, 28 November 2010 8:08:26 AM
| |
Proxy,
"Sexual behaviour is not immutable." Without you having an anecdotal hissy spit, would you care to share some of your own not-immutable personal sexual experiences. Most of us are adults or broadminded adolescents here, so you can say what you like. I love a bit of porn on Sunday morn. Now, where's that popcorn. David Posted by Atheist Foundation of Australia Inc, Sunday, 28 November 2010 8:34:48 AM
| |
<<I love a bit of porn on Sunday morn>>
Who cares? Just don't call it marriage and ram it down the throats of children. The existence and testimony of ex-homosexuals such as: Linda Jernigan Charlene Coltrane Michael Glatze Jackie Clune Janet Boynes demonstrate that homosexuality is not immutable. Please provide just five examples of people who have changed their race. I'll even accept Michael Jackson as your number one. Posted by Proxy, Sunday, 28 November 2010 9:14:33 AM
| |
I said not anecdotal. Gee! you are gullible. Do you know anything about these people, their psychological make up, their religious beliefs/fears, their insecurities etc.
Have you any friends who are same-sex oriented (Apart from possibly yourself)and if so, what do they think of your bigoted rantings? David Posted by Atheist Foundation of Australia Inc, Sunday, 28 November 2010 9:23:38 AM
| |
<<Gee! you are gullible.>>
I guess I was gullible in believing that you might eventually bring evidence to the table. I even helped you by providing you with the first, albeit whimsical, example of mutability of race. <<Have you any friends who are same-sex oriented (Apart from possibly yourself)and if so, what do they think of your bigoted rantings?>> <<I said not anecdotal.>> So you are prepared to accept anecdotal "evidence" from me in favour of your proposition but contrarily condemn as anecdotal the testimony of people who undermine your position. You truly are a progressive! I guess it's what one would expect from a self-confessed voyeur who solicits porn over the internet. http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=11272#190744 Posted by Proxy, Sunday, 28 November 2010 9:45:18 AM
|
X, in this case, was 'interracial'. Y was 'black and white'.
'One of the most pressing problems facing America in these early days of the 21st century, is that of interracial marriage, especially between black and white.'
Doesn't sound so defensible when you exchange 'gay' for 'interracial', does it?