The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Jilting the independents is prime ministerial > Comments

Jilting the independents is prime ministerial : Comments

By Alan Anderson, published 31/8/2010

Much of the commentary seems to have gone to the heads of the Independents. You'd think they'd each been elected President of Australia.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All
JS Mill: "I do think that it is all rather unpleasant and undignified for the entire country to be effectively held to ransom by three people who represent just 2% of the population."

The country is not being "held to ransom" by anyone. The Electoral Office has not yet declared an election result. This has nothing whatsoever to do with the Independents.
Posted by briar rose, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 7:04:56 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Briar Rose - I am trying to work out what you mean by "This has nothing whatsoever to do with the Independents."
If you are right then someone ought to tell Abbott and Gillard that they can ignore Katter, Windsor and Oakeshott (and Wilkie). Someone also should advise Lateline/QandA/Meet the Press and every other media punditry outlet that they can stop trying to talk to these guys because they are irrelevant. Of course, the Independents' list of demands can be immediately binned. Having the support of the independents is not going to mean anyone going to the GG or appearing on the press and announcing a resignation.
Nor is it going to put an end to the speculation and uncertainty.
You really don't think that maybe it has just a little bit to do with the Independents?
Posted by J S Mill, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 2:26:40 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The Independents are currently serving one of the best causes that they can - to remind people that fail to be able to see beyond the tip of their nose that there is more to this country than a new surburban rail link. (yes I'm from the country)

Many many city jobs depend on things produced around the countryside (exporting them, manufacturing them, selling them), those in turn generate the need for shopping, health services, financial services. There is a huge flow-on effect beyond the immediate area where things are produced. When government formulates policy and legislation, these things can readily be forgotten. The Independents (and even more so the media that is hanging off them), are reminding everyone about where much of this starts. That cant be a bad thing, for the countryside and for the city areas in the longer term.

One thing that I think all sides should bear in mind is that the Independents are mostly conservative (which is why most spring from the National Party originally and not Labor). They are unlikely to pick sides with a party who plans significant change - we are unlikely to see an ETS this term (and probably a good thing, as the mechanism hasnt been properly worked out yet: needs a few more years of debating). Likewise we are unlikely to see significant new taxes etc. Its likely to be a time for both sides to take a bit of a hiatus and have the opportunity to fine-tune more significant policy for the next election in 3 years time. This could be a win-win for everyone.
Posted by Country Gal, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 10:50:33 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy